ブックタイトル佐藤栄作論文集9~16

ページ
860/912

このページは 佐藤栄作論文集9~16 の電子ブックに掲載されている860ページの概要です。
秒後に電子ブックの対象ページへ移動します。
「ブックを開く」ボタンをクリックすると今すぐブックを開きます。

ActiBookアプリアイコンActiBookアプリをダウンロード(無償)

  • Available on the Appstore
  • Available on the Google play
  • Available on the Windows Store

概要

佐藤栄作論文集9~16

regarding the roles of the United Nations and are ready to compromise on changes inthe system, years of international gridlock could lie ahead. 17 Though far less numerous,there are also those who are of the opinion that recent changes in the internationallandscape seem to indicate that more subjective and objective conditions may nowexist than at any moment in the recent past for the implementation of the principlesof collective security. 18The ideas propounded by the aforementioned schools of thought on the impossibilityor undesirability of a collective security system all have elements of truth -- at leastto some extent. But neither of them seems to outweigh the urgent need to worktowards this end. We reason out as follows. On the alleged superiority of traditionaldiplomacy to collective security arrangement, it should first be pointed out that thetwo can be made complementary. Adopting the idea of collective security should not,and will not, lead to the rejection of traditional diplomacy. As to the view regardingthe relationship between the way the status quo is perceived(as satisfactory orunsatisfactory)by each major power and the efficacy of a collective security regime;this too is quite understandable. But dissatisfaction with the status quo does notnecessarily prompt the dissatisfied power to reject the idea of joining the regimebecause despite the apparent dissatisfaction it may prove to be basically impossible tochange it. Under the circumstances, if joining a regime for such a power would be abad choice, not joining would be even worse.Our own position on this matter, therefore, is that opponents of a collective securityframework tend to overestimate the barriers to such an arrangement. The realbarrier to a meaningful collective security regime may well be the understandableabsence of a political will among the member-states, particularly the major powers.The simultaneous existence of alliances and collective defense systems that have85817 See P. Kennedy and B. Russet,“Reforming the United Nations,”Foreign Affairs, September/October, 1995, p. 75.18 See, for example, D. Dewitt et al(Eds.)Building A New Global Order: Emerging Trends in International Security(Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 88-89.