ブックタイトル佐藤栄作　受賞論文集

概要

佐藤栄作　受賞論文集

cleansing and crimes against humanity.”11The WSOD was followed by two resolutions which reaffirmed the internationalcommunity’s commitment to RtoP. Resolution 1674 on the Protection of Civiliansin Armed Conflict (POC) and Resolution 1894 was adopted by the SC in 2006 and2009 respectively. Both resolutions deal primarily with the responsibility of the stateconcerned, but also recognise that if the state is unable or unwilling to mitigate thesituation it“may constitute a threat to international peace and security, and reaffirmsin this regard its readiness to consider such situations and, where necessary, to adoptappropriate steps.”12 Since 2005, the RtoP has become a mainstream concept and mostlikely it will continue to influence the future of peacekeeping. Its actual application hasbeen successful in some cases, but less so in others. The next sub-section discussessome of those.(iv) Case Study: Recent Humanitarian CrisesThe RtoP doctrine has been evoked in connection to Darfur, Myanmar, Libya,Cote d’Ivoire and Syria. Chart 1 gives a brief summary of the cases.The application of the RtoP doctrine in Myanmar was rejected and the crisiswas elevated by ASEAN taking responsibility. A resolution based on RtoP for thedeployment of peacekeeping forces to Darfur was first passed in 2006. However, theactual implementation suffered from shortages in capability and made the adoption ofa second resolution necessary in 2007, which increased the number of peacekeepers.Military intervention was carried out both in Libya and in Cote d’Ivoire and succeededin eliminating the immediate threat to civilians. Peacekeeping operations are deployed107011 (World Summit Outcome, 2005)12 (Resolution 1674, 2006)