ブックタイトル佐藤栄作　受賞論文集

概要

佐藤栄作　受賞論文集

Also, the UNDC will be a good organisation for dictators all over the world.It is obvious that even autocrats may be in danger from the example of Libya; thedeath of Qaddafi. It can happen in other states in Not Free states (see Table 1). Sincethe transition to democracy tends to make conflict as Boutros-Ghali (1996: para. 20)suggests the UNDC should be responsible for democratisation. Protection of thedictator is not primarily for his/her profit, but for people in the state. He/she has tobe protected because it will make stable transition to democracy. The UNDC has tochange the regime peacefully, and it will lead to stable democratisation. However, itis good for dictators too because they can be killed without the UNDC. If they wantto save their lives, the UNDC can help them while it helps democratisation of thestate. When autocrats see these points, the UNDC will be a good organisation for bothdictators and people.ConclusionThe United Nations fails to work effectively to prevent conflict because it did notwork efficiently for democratisation. The UN should establish the DemocratisationCouncil to accelerate democratisation throughout the world. Recent uprising in theArab region shows that many people want to overthrow authoritarian regimesbecause they abuse human rights. To obtain their human rights, people died, andtragedies still continue. Syrian example clearly shows that limitations of the UN tostop armed conflict. Once armed conflict begins, the UN cannot stop it easily. Whilethe Human Rights Council is working for protecting human rights, there are someproblems for democratisation. To solve issues, the UNDC should be establishedto democratise states. It classifies states according to conditions of human rightsprotection. It advises to states which do not respect human rights. If the condition1012